It's a well-known question without a clear answer: Do we have free will? The reason for the unclear or unsatisfying answers is that the question has some flaws. The question is based on a vague assumption of 'we'. Really we need to know who 'we' are, then we can look at whether 'we' have free will.

The usual assumption is that 'we' are humans. But if you understand enough of what I've written previously this won't be a surprise: we are not humans. The 'human' is not really defined, as it is a flowing, changing quality of planet Earth and the universe. The 'human' is not separate, and although seemingly distinct, it is not truly distinct from the universe. If we trace inward to the core of our being we find that we are not 'human'. We are the same Infinite One Consciousness that is the nature of all seemingly separate beings.

So this separate individual 'me' can never be clearly defined. It is a flawed identity. Our true nature is limitless Consciousness. So instead of asking, "Does Helen decide what drink she will have?" it could be worded as, "Does Consciousness decide what drink Helen will have?" It's still a bit flawed, because 'Helen' isn't really precise and accurate, but we'll go with that.

In answering this we have to recognise that the flow of thoughts in Helen's mind decides what drink she will have, based on tastes and preferences developed through the human experience. Taste buds, availability, and life events all come into play for this simple decision. So it seems wrong to say that Consciousness is making the decision. Maybe if Helen's mind was pure and clear, untainted by thoughts, then Consciousness would shine through in all Helen's actions, including choices. For example, instead of Helen choosing coffee with three sugars based on an addictive preference for coffee and sweetness, a drink of water may be more conducive to Helen's health. Consciousness would have no preference as such, but the natural flow would be more in line with the true nature of Consciousness lighting up the human experience with love, goodness, peace and wellbeing.

So generally the mind plays a part in choices. The mind thinks that it is a separate identity making choices. But really there isn't a true identity, and what choices seem to be made are influenced by the flow of experiences. In other words, just as the 'human' is a flowing quality of the planet, so are the choices that the mind seems to make. It is all the flowing of the universe. There is no true division to enable us to say 'I' chose 'that'. There is a play of choice, an illusion of a chooser choosing choices. Truly there is only Consciousness.

But Consciousness is certainly free. There are no true boundaries to Consciousness. Consciousness is freedom itself. Consciousness doesn't choose, restrict, deny or allow. It just is what it is. What appears, appears. We're getting to the deeper questions of: Does Consciousness create the world, does it co-ordinate what happens in the world, and does it pre-ordain events to happen in the world?

Again we have some flaws in the questions here. There is an assumption that there is a 'world', but there is only Consciousness. There is an assumption that events really happen. Consider this: it would be wrong of someone to say, "I flew to the moon last night whilst I was sleeping." We know that it was a dream of flying to the moon - that didn't really happen. It is similar with the appearance of the world - it is like a dream within Consciousness. It doesn't really happen. There is no space or time for things to travel and change. Nothing ever happens.

So in an absolute sense, there is no choice, there is no choosing, because nothing ever happens. Consciousness just is what it is. This is the Absolute Truth, where no movement or change happens. Realise that so-called beginnings rise out of Infinity, and so-called ends return to Infinity, all the while being Infinity. So to say that Infinity begins or ends something is flawed. There is only ever Infinite Consciousness.

But we can make a concession, a step down from Pure Truth to relative truth, and say something to satisfy the mind somewhat. Well, I'll give it a try anyway. The appearance of the world arises in Consciousness, made of Consciousness, perceived by Consciousness. It is Consciousness that allows this appearance by means of opposites as if the Singularity of Consciousness splits into opposites and multiplies. As part of this splitting, the opposites of Creation and Destruction arise from the Singularity simultaneously. So although Consciousness/God doesn't make anything happen, from the human perspective it can appear that Consciousness/God created the world, whilst seeming to destroy the Singularity.

But the opposite forces we perceive as separate are not really separate. The world isn't created and the Singularity isn't destroyed. The force of creation/will that seems to make things happen is cancelled out by its opposite, destruction/restriction. Everything that seems to be done must be undone, so the nature of the Singularity remains. This is the Law of Opposites that applies to all aspects of the appearance of the world. The Singularity of Consciousness/God remains as it is. The appearance of the world of multiplicity is illusory.

So, to answer the question: Do we have free will? There is no 'we', no separate individual that makes choices. There is no will to do something, because nothing really happens. But there is freedom. Freedom is the pure nature of our Infinite Being.